![]() On an appeal from summary judgment, we ask two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine Of income under the Minnesota No-Fault Insurance Act? ANALYSIS ![]() Roquemoreĭoes the loss of a college athletic scholarship that paid for tuition, room, and board constitute a loss Lost scholarship is not a loss of income, the district court granted State Farm's motion. The loss of a scholarship qualifies as a loss of income under the no-fault insurance act. ![]() ![]() Both parties moved for summary judgment on the question of whether He petitioned for arbitration and State Farm moved in districtĬourt to stay the arbitration. Since Roquemore did not own a car, he sought no-fault income-loss benefits from State Farm, the University did not renew his scholarship. Because of his injuries, Roquemore could not play football and the At the time of the accident, he was attending a university on a football scholarship that paid Roquemore suffered injuries to his back, hip, and knee when he was hit by a car as he walked on a Under the Minnesota No-Fault Insurance Act. Respondent State Farm, arguing that the loss of an athletic scholarship constitutes a loss of income O P I N I O NĪppellant Michael Roquemore appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Under the doctrine of ejusdem generis, the loss of an athletic scholarship does not constitute a loss of income under the Minnesota No-Fault Insurance Act, Minn. Box 70, Hopkins, MN 55343 (forĬonsidered and decided by Shumaker, Presiding Judge, Crippen, Judge, and Klaphake, Judge. Cosgriff, 10285 Yellow Circle Drive, P.O. Lubov, 820 North Lilac Drive, Suite 210, Golden Valley, MNīradley T. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Respondent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |